IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 29 Apr 2008 Members (asterisk for those attending): Ambrish Varma, Cadence Design Systems * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Arpad Muranyi, Mentor Graphics Corp. Barry Katz, SiSoft * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group * Brad Brim, Sigrity * Brad Griffin, Cadence Design Systems * David Banas, Xilinx Donald Telian, consultant Doug White, Cisco Systems Essaid Bensoudane, ST Microelectronics Ganesh Narayanaswamy, ST Micro * Gang Kang, Sigrity Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems Ian Dodd Joe Abler, IBM * John Angulo, Mentor Graphics John Shields, Mentor Graphics Ken Willis, Cadence Design Systems Kumar Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems Luis Boluna, Cisco Michael Mirmak, Intel Corp. * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Steinberger, SiSoft Mustansir Fanaswalla, Xilinx Patrick O'Halloran, Tiburon Design Automation Paul Fernando, NCSU * Radek Biernacki, Agilent (EESof) * Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Ray Comeau, Cadence Design Systems Richard Mellitz, Intel Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Sam Chitwood, Sigrity Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Shangli Wu, Cadence * Sid Singh, Extreme Networks Stephen Scearce, Cisco Systems Steve Pytel, Ansoft Syed Huq, Cisco Systems Syed Sadeghi, ST Micro * Terry Jernberg, Cadence Design Systems * Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Vikas Gupta, Xilinx Vuk Borich, Agilent * Walter Katz, SiSoft * Zhen Mu, Cadence -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. ----- Opens: John Angulo chair Has BIRD 107 been submitted? - Walter sent this last week. - There was one revision to fix the document title property. - Some confusion over whether this is an official BIRD submission. - Michael M. will post the last version received. ------------- Review of ARs: - Arpad will send BIRD 107 to Michael M and Bob - Done - Michael M list pros and cons of ICM and EMD - not present - Walter send "final" BIRD 107 documents - Done - David Banas report Xilinx position on LTI assumption for SerDes - No update - Arpad: Write parameter passing syntax proposal (BIRD draft) for *-AMS models in IBIS that is consistent with the parameter passing syntax of the AMI models - TBD - TBD: Propose a parameter passing syntax for the SPICE - [External ...] also? - TBD - Arpad: Review the documentation (annotation) in the macro libraries. - Deferred until a demand arises or we have nothing else to do ------------- New Discussion: Mike LaBonte will be unable to join for the next 2 weeks - Someone else will have to take minutes Bob presented the BIRD 107.2 draft with modifications: - Some people had difficulty getting into April 25 Open Forum meeting where BIRD 107 was previously discussed. - Underscores have been added in certain places for consistency - Kumar sent email to the list presenting some issues - Todd: Kumar is no longer affiliated with Cadence - "impulse matrix" appears in many places without underscores - This will be proposed as BIRD 108 Walter presented "ICM vs EMD" by comparing a simplified 9 pin IC package in both formats: - The EMD format is less verbose - John: This does not matter as much when programs write and read them. - If coupled wires are unequal length, they have to be broken into bands. - [Port Names] has been added to EMD for convenience. - Example: port 1 = D.1, port 10 = B.1 - In this 18-port example, a sparse S-parameter matrix has 27 entries out of 324 for the full matrix. - Reduction is even more dramatic as pin count increases. - Bob: May be some danger with sparse matrix format: - Walter: Maybe the parameter should not be "TouchstoneFile" - John: Will this delay Touchstone 2, or become part of Touchstone 3? - Walter: A sparse S-param format would be part of an ICM or EMD layer above the Touchstone file. - Walter: Customers are more interested in delay than coupling, and may have a mix of RLGC and S-param data. - John: ICM is unable to mix and match W and S elements. AR: Walter send "ICM vs EMC" to Mike for web posting Next meeting: 06 May 2008 12:00pm PT -----------